Love this headline from The Independent: First drugs, then terror: now U.S. in 'war with spinach'. It's a funny take in the current food crisis, but some people have seriously suggested that the bacteria were planted by terrorists and the government has had to spend resources debunking this myth. It also reminds us of the so-called drug war and today Congress is set to take up some of the craziest bills proposed yet in that war. Amongst the offerings? Warrentless searches, including strip searches of students. No evidence necessary! Also in the front of that war, the government has begun posting their worthless, $1.2 billion of anti-drug PSAs on YouTube. Commence the remixes, folks.
Bush is blocking the campaign to put pressure on Darfur. As manager of the U.S. efforts, Bush has nominated the man who, as the head of U.S. AID, promised that the rebuilding of Iraq would cost no more than $1.7 billion. We're at $20 billion and counting. He's also the guy who ran the crumbling 'Big Dig' project in Boston. How much did he give to the Republican Party?
2 comments:
Well as I started reading I thought I should post a link to the Washington Post story I read yesterday. Then "Never mind, he already found it."
It is a psychotically sick irony that a bogus war of agression might have actually succeeded if the architects could rein in their embedded corruption just a teensy bit.
Apparently, the Heritage Foundation issued a report in the early days after the Bushtista Coup (circa 2000/2001) that suggested that they team employ loyalists over what they termed "technocrats". In other words, policy theocrats over qualified individuals.
Post a Comment